Digital Camera Vs Film Camera
How many times have you asked yourself when deciding to purchase a camera – Should I go digital or should I go film?
Well, here’s a third choice – How about a hybrid? Meaning, both digital and film in one? No, I’m not kidding. Check this article out.
November 16, 2006 at 5:59 am
Ohh man…did u like this gizmo? Didnt look impressive
>>It may be a decent Christmas present for the child in your home, though
That review words sums it up!
November 16, 2006 at 6:11 am
Nirek: Well, when they started to manufacture those Digital Cameras, everyone thought the same. You never know, if someone could take this up seriously, we could have a Digital/Film SLR in the same camera.
Yeah, I realize it sounds far fetched, but it’s a start.
November 17, 2006 at 4:28 am
Interesting.
I am not that much of a photographer (more of an aim and shoot kind). So I prefer a digital camera any day!!
November 17, 2006 at 4:35 am
PizzaDude: Neither am I.
The advantage that Film cameras have is that the resolution of the image is way too higher than any Digital Camera affordable to common people. Apparently, as a friend of mine says, scanning a 35 mm negative can give resolutions of upto 25 Mega Pixels! :O
November 17, 2006 at 8:37 am
25 Megapixels from 35 mm negative ? :O
Whoa!!! That was something I didnt know.
November 17, 2006 at 10:04 am
PizzaDude: Yup. Check the following links out:
A D200 Vs an image scan. Do remember to check out the sample images.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/filmdig.htm
Another short, but very comprehensive article on why this magazine doesn’t accept photos from digital cameras:
http://www.arizonahighways.com/page.cfm?name=Photo_Talk803